It is necessarily a kind of package deal involving anticipation, travel to the site, the activity itself, the return travel and finally recollection. Hence it is most appropriate for those outlets where travel cost is a major component of total visit costs typically to free countryside outlets.Īccording to Clawson and Knetsch, outdoor recreation activities satisfy individual needs, such as physical, social or psychological. This method uses information on travel costs to generate a final demand curve for a recreation outlet. It is a technique commonly associated with benefit estimation in recreation cost-benefit analysis. The most common forecasting technique for a specific site is the Clawson- Knetsch-Hotelling method. The consumers’ surplus associated with the demand curve provides an estimate of the value of the recreational site in question. The price is usually the sum of entry fees to the site, cost of travel, and opportunity cost of time spent. number of visits per year to a park) as a function of variables like price, visitors’ income, and socio-economic characteristics. This method seeks to determine the demand for a recreational site (i.e. This approach is widely used to value the recreational benefits of public parks and other natural areas. This curve is in turn used to estimate the consumers’ surplus or value of the site to all users. The travel-cost method is a widely used surrogate market approach that relies on information on time and travel costs to derive a demand curve for a recreational site. There are a number of revealed preference methods such as travel- cost method, hedonic price method and property value method. There may be complementary goods or other factor inputs in the household’s production function. The demand for environmental goods can be revealed by examining the purchases of related goods in the private market place. But testing the accuracy of their forecasts is not yet possible, especially since the predictions are only meant to be general perspectives. Some recent Delphi exercises have been recreation-specific. A sufficiently large sample of experts is presented individually with a list of events on which to attach probabilities and to which other events, with probabilities may be added. This is really a specialized survey technique designed to overcome the speculative and isolated nature of expert opinions. When no money is involved, the approach becomes similar to the costless-choice method. The choice indicates a person’s willingness to trade money for an increased level of an environmental good. Each bundle might, for example, include a different sum of money plus varying levels of an environmental resource. The trade-off game method is a variant of the bidding game wherein respondents are asked to choose between two different bundles of goods. In an iterative (repeating) bid game the respondents are given a variety of bids to determine at what price they are indifferent between receiving (or paying) the bid or receiving (or losing) the environmental good at issue. In a single bid game the respondents are asked to give a single bid equal to their willingness to pay or willingness to accept compensation for the environmental good or service described. This method relates to a set of contingent valuation techniques that rely on the creation of a hypothetical market for some good or service. We will discuss trade-off game method, costless-choice method, and Delphi method as part of contingent valuation approach. This method is more effective when the respondents are familiar with the environmental good or service and have adequate information on which to base their preferences. This method puts direct questions to individuals to determine how much they might be willing to pay for environmental resources or how much compensation they would be willing to accept if they were deprived of the same resources. Contingent valuation frequently elicits information on willingness to pay or willingness to accept compensation for an increase or decrease in some usually non-marketed goods or services. Most survey-based techniques are examples of contingent valuation method. Contingent Valuation Method (CVM):Īnalytic survey techniques rely on hypothetical situations to place a monetary value on goods or services. Moreover, expressed preference techniques ask individuals explicitly how much they value an environmental good. These techniques avoid the need to find a complementary good (travel or house), or a substitute good (compensating wage rate), to derive a demand curve and hence estimate how much an individual implicitly values an environmental good. The demand for environmental goods can be measured by examining individuals’ expressed preference for these goods relative to their demand for other goods and services. The following methods are used for environmental valuation: (A) Expressed Preference Methods:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |